Classification of Trauma-Associated Invasive Fungal Infections to Support Wound Treatment Decisions

Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;25(9):1639-1647. doi: 10.3201/eid2509.190168.

Abstract

To evaluate a classification system to support clinical decisions for treatment of contaminated deep wounds at risk for an invasive fungal infection (IFI), we studied 246 US service members (413 wounds) injured in Afghanistan (2009-2014) who had laboratory evidence of fungal infection. A total of 143 wounds with persistent necrosis and laboratory evidence were classified as IFI; 120 wounds not meeting IFI criteria were classified as high suspicion (patients had localized infection signs/symptoms and had received antifungal medication for >10 days), and 150 were classified as low suspicion (failed to meet these criteria). IFI patients received more blood than other patients and had more severe injuries than patients in the low-suspicion group. Fungi of the order Mucorales were more frequently isolated from IFI (39%) and high-suspicion (21%) wounds than from low-suspicion (9%) wounds. Wounds that did not require immediate antifungal therapy lacked necrosis and localized signs/symptoms of infection and contained fungi from orders other than Mucorales.

Keywords: Afghanistan; bacteria; blast wound; fungi; invasive fungal infections; mucormycosis; trauma; wound infection.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Afghan Campaign 2001-
  • Aspergillus / isolation & purification
  • Decision Support Systems, Clinical*
  • Fusarium / isolation & purification
  • Humans
  • Invasive Fungal Infections / classification
  • Invasive Fungal Infections / microbiology
  • Invasive Fungal Infections / prevention & control*
  • Military Personnel*
  • Mucorales / isolation & purification
  • Multiple Trauma*
  • United States
  • Wound Infection / classification
  • Wound Infection / microbiology
  • Wound Infection / prevention & control*