The understanding of the physiology of astrocytes and their role in brain function progresses continuously. Primary astrocyte culture is an alternative method to study these cells in an isolated system: in their physiologic and pathologic states. Cell lines are often used as an astrocyte model, since they are easier and faster to manipulate and cost less. However, there are a few studies evaluating the different features of these cells which may put into question the validity of using them as astrocyte models. The aim of this study was to compare primary cultures (PC) with two cell lines - immortalized astrocytes and C6 cells, in terms of protein characterization, morphology and metabolic functional activity. Our results showed, under the same culture condition, that immortalized astrocytes and C6 are positive for differentiated astrocytic markers (eg. GFAP, S100B, AQP4 and ALDH1L1), although expressing them in less quantities then primary astrocyte cultures. Glutamate metabolism and cell communication are reduced in proliferative cells. However, glucose uptake is elevated in C6 lineage cells in comparison with primary astrocytes, probably due to their tumorigenic origin and high proliferation rate. Immortalized astrocytes presented a lower growth rate than C6 cells, and a similar basal morphology as primary astrocytes. However, they did not prove to be as good reproductive models of some of the classic astrocytic functions, such as S100B secretion and GFAP content, especially while under stimulation. In contrast, C6 cells presented similar results in comparison to primary astrocytes in response to stimuli. Here we provide a functional comparison of three astrocytic models, in an attempt to select the most suitable model for the study of astrocytes, optimizing the research in this area of knowledge.
Keywords: Astrocyte culture; Astrocyte function; C6 cells; Immortalized astrocytes.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.