Comparison of Serologic Assays for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Oct;25(10):1878-1883. doi: 10.3201/eid2510.190497. Epub 2019 Oct 17.

Abstract

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) was detected in humans in 2012. Since then, sporadic outbreaks with primary transmission through dromedary camels to humans and outbreaks in healthcare settings have shown that MERS-CoV continues to pose a threat to human health. Several serologic assays for MERS-CoV have been developed globally. We describe a collaborative study to investigate the comparability of serologic assays for MERS-CoV and assess any benefit associated with the introduction of a standard reference reagent for MERS-CoV serology. Our study findings indicate that, when possible, laboratories should use a testing algorithm including >2 tests to ensure correct diagnosis of MERS-CoV. We also demonstrate that the use of a reference reagent greatly improves the agreement between assays, enabling more consistent and therefore more meaningful comparisons between results.

Keywords: MERS-CoV; Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; Oman; Saudi Arabia; South Korea; antibodies; diagnostics; serology; standard; viruses.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Viral / blood
  • Antibodies, Viral / immunology
  • Coronavirus Infections / blood
  • Coronavirus Infections / diagnosis*
  • Coronavirus Infections / immunology
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique
  • Humans
  • Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus* / immunology
  • Neutralization Tests
  • Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
  • Reference Standards
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Serologic Tests / methods

Substances

  • Antibodies, Viral