Salvage therapy versus upfront autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients with progressive disease after first-line induction therapy

Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Jan;61(1):27-36. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1646905. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

Abstract

It is a matter of debate whether myeloma patients with progressive disease (PD) after induction should receive salvage therapy or proceed directly to autologous stem cell transplantation. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1599 patients treated between 1991 and 2016 at the University Hospital of Heidelberg and other centers. Deepening of response through salvage therapy did not lead to better progression-free or overall survival (PD versus salvage therapy patients: HR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.28, 1.80], p = 0.5 and HR = 0.77, 95% CI [0.30, 1.95], p = 0.6, respectively), neither in patients treated with novel agents (HR = 0.66, 95% CI [0.23, 1.85], p = 0.4 and HR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.27, 2.15], p = 0.6) nor older regimens (HR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.36, 2.07], p = 0.7 and HR = 0.8, 95% CI [0.34, 1.91], p = 0.6). Therefore, primary nonresponders might benefit from a direct transplant rather than salvage induction, although the analyzed salvage therapy cohort was small (n = 23) and cytogenetics was not included in the multivariable analysis.

Keywords: Multiple myeloma; autologous stem cell transplantation; salvage therapy.

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation* / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Induction Chemotherapy
  • Multiple Myeloma* / drug therapy
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Salvage Therapy
  • Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Transplantation, Autologous
  • Treatment Outcome