Background: There is growing interest in sensor-based assessment of upper limb tremor in multiple sclerosis and other movement disorders. However, previously such assessments have not been found to offer any improvement over conventional clinical observation in identifying clinically relevant changes in an individual's tremor symptoms, due to poor test-retest repeatability.
Method: We hypothesised that this barrier could be overcome by constructing a tremor change metric that is customised to each individual's tremor characteristics, such that random variability can be distinguished from clinically relevant changes in symptoms. In a cohort of 24 people with tremor due to multiple sclerosis, the newly proposed metrics were compared against conventional clinical and sensor-based metrics. Each metric was evaluated based on Spearman rank correlation with two reference metrics extracted from the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale: a task-based measure of functional disability (FTMTRS B) and the subject's self-assessment of the impact of tremor on their activities of daily living (FTMTRS C).
Results: Unlike the conventional sensor-based and clinical metrics, the newly proposed 'change in scale' metrics presented statistically significant correlations with changes in self-assessed impact of tremor (max R2>0.5,p<0.05 after correction for false discovery rate control). They also outperformed all other metrics in terms of correlations with changes in task-based functional performance (R2=0.25 vs. R2=0.15 for conventional clinical observation, both p<0.05).
Conclusions: The proposed metrics achieve an elusive goal of sensor-based tremor assessment: improving on conventional visual observation in terms of sensitivity to change. Further refinement and evaluation of the proposed techniques is required, but our core findings imply that the main barrier to translational impact for this application can be overcome. Sensor-based tremor assessments may improve personalised treatment selection and the efficiency of clinical trials for new treatments by enabling greater standardisation and sensitivity to clinically relevant changes in symptoms.
Keywords: Biomedical signal processing; Movement analysis; Multiple sclerosis; Sensitivity and specificity; Tremor.