Cost-effectiveness analysis of universal varicella vaccination in Turkey using a dynamic transmission model

PLoS One. 2019 Aug 13;14(8):e0220921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220921. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Background: In 2013, Turkey introduced one-dose universal varicella vaccination (UVV) at 12 months of age. Inclusion of a second dose is being considered.

Methods: We developed a dynamic transmission model to evaluate three vaccination strategies: single dose at 12 months (1D) or second dose at either 18 months (2D-short) or 6 years of age (2D-long). Costs and utilization were age-stratified and separated into inpatient and outpatient costs for varicella and herpes zoster (HZ). We ran the model including and excluding HZ-related costs and impact of exogenous boosting.

Results: Five years post-introduction of UVV (1D), the projected varicella incidence rate decreases from 1,674 cases pre-vaccine to 80 cases/100,000 person-years. By 25 years, varicella incidence equilibrates at 39, 12, and 16 cases/100,000 person-years for 1D, 2D-short, and 2D-long strategies, respectively, using a highly effective vaccine. With or without including exogenous boosting impact and/or HZ-related costs and health benefits, the 1D strategy is least costly, but 2-dose strategies are cost-effective considering a willingness-to-pay threshold equivalent to the gross domestic product. The model predicted a modest increase in HZ burden during the first 20-30 years, after which time HZ incidence equilibrates at a lower rate than pre-vaccine.

Conclusions: Our findings support adding a second varicella vaccine dose in Turkey, as doing so is highly cost-effective across a wide range of assumptions regarding the burden associated with varicella and HZ disease.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Chickenpox Vaccine* / administration & dosage
  • Chickenpox Vaccine* / economics
  • Chickenpox* / economics
  • Chickenpox* / epidemiology
  • Chickenpox* / prevention & control
  • Chickenpox* / transmission
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Female
  • Herpes Zoster* / economics
  • Herpes Zoster* / epidemiology
  • Herpes Zoster* / prevention & control
  • Herpes Zoster* / transmission
  • Herpesvirus 3, Human*
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Biological*
  • Models, Economic*
  • Turkey / epidemiology
  • Vaccination*

Substances

  • Chickenpox Vaccine

Grants and funding

This work was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Employees of the funder participated in the study design, in the analysis and interpretation of the data, in the preparation of the manuscript, and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.