Simulation of impact on cardiovascular events due to lipid-lowering therapy intensification in a population with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Am Heart J. 2019 Oct:216:30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

Abstract

In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), guidelines recommend statins as first-line lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) with addition of nonstatin agents in those with persistently elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

Methods: To estimate the cardiovascular (CV) risk reduction implications of treatment intensification, we used a previously reported simulation model with enhancements. An ASCVD cohort was developed from a US claims database. A Cox model was used to estimate baseline risk of CV events: myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, unstable angina hospitalization, elective coronary revascularization, or cardiovascular death. Patients were sampled with replacement (bootstrapping) and entered the simulation model, which applied stepwise LLT intensification logic, with a goal of achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol less than 70 mg/dL at each step. CV risk reduction assumptions were based on published data. Two treatment intensification scenarios were investigated: ideal and real-world (which accounted for statin intolerance, nonadherence, and payer restrictions).

Results: In a cohort of 1,000 patients with ASCVD, approximately 813 (809-818) would require treatment intensification with LLT under an ideal treatment intensification scenario. Before treatment intensification, 183 (179-187) events would be expected to occur over 5 years. With treatment intensification, 40 (34-45) of these events could be avoided. In a real-world scenario, about 818 (813-823) patients require treatment intensification with LLT, resulting in 29 (24-34) events avoided over 5 years.

Conclusions: Intensification of LLT in an ASCVD population translates into a substantial number of CV events avoided. This simulation-based model could assist in assessing the potential benefits of various types of population-level LLT interventions.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Angina, Unstable / mortality
  • Angina, Unstable / prevention & control*
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / therapeutic use
  • Atherosclerosis / blood
  • Atherosclerosis / complications
  • Atherosclerosis / drug therapy*
  • Atherosclerosis / therapy
  • Cause of Death
  • Cholesterol, LDL / blood*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Elective Surgical Procedures / statistics & numerical data
  • Ezetimibe / therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Hospitalization / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Hypolipidemic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Insurance, Health, Reimbursement
  • Male
  • Medication Adherence
  • Middle Aged
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Myocardial Infarction / mortality
  • Myocardial Infarction / prevention & control*
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / statistics & numerical data
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Risk
  • Stroke / mortality
  • Stroke / prevention & control*

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • Cholesterol, LDL
  • Hypolipidemic Agents
  • Ezetimibe
  • evolocumab
  • alirocumab