How a measure of tree structural complexity relates to architectural benefit-to-cost ratio, light availability, and growth of trees

Ecol Evol. 2019 May 26;9(12):7134-7142. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5281. eCollection 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Aboveground tree architecture is neither fully deterministic nor random. It is likely the result of mechanisms that balance static requirements and light-capturing efficiency. Here, we used terrestrial laser scanning data to investigate the relationship between tree architecture, here addressed using the box-dimension (D b), and the architectural benefit-to-cost ratio, the light availability, and the growth of trees. We detected a clear relationship between D b and the benefit-to-cost ratio for the tested three temperate forest tree species (Fagus sylvatica L., Fraxinus excelsior L., and Acer pseudoplatanus L.). In addition, we could also show that D b is positively related to the growth performance of several tropical tree species. Finally, we observed a negative relationship between the strength of competition enforced on red oak (Quercus rubra L.) trees and their D b. We therefore argue that D b is a meaningful and integrative measure that describes the structural complexity of the aboveground compartments of a plant as well as its relation to structural efficiency (benefit-to-cost ratio), productivity, and growing conditions (competition or availability of light).

Keywords: Germany; Indonesia; box‐dimension; fractal analysis; light availability; plant architecture; productivity.

Associated data

  • Dryad/10.5061/dryad.b1r6km8