Intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Argentina: Treatment and survival analysis

World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 21;25(27):3607-3618. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3607.

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the sixteenth most frequent cancer in Argentina. The rise of new therapeutic modalities in intermediate-advanced HCC opens up a new paradigm for the treatment of HCC.

Aim: To describe real-life treatments performed in patients with intermediate-advanced HCC before the approval of new systemic options.

Methods: This longitudinal observational cohort study was conducted between 2009 and 2016 in 14 different regional hospitals from Argentina. Included subjects had intermediate-advanced Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) HCC stages (BCLC B to D). Primary end point analyzed was survival, which was assessed for each BCLC stage from the date of treatment until last patient follow-up or death. Kaplan Meier survival curves and Cox regression analysis were performed, with hazard ratios (HR) calculations and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

Results: From 327 HCC patients, 41% were BCLC stage B, 20% stage C and 39% stage D. Corresponding median survival were 15 mo (IQR 5-26 mo), 5 mo (IQR 2-13 mo) and 3 mo (IQR 1-13 mo) (P < 0.0001), respectively. Among BCLC-B patients (n = 135), 57% received TACE with a median number of 2 sessions (IQR 1-3 sessions). Survival was significantly better in BCLC-B patients treated with TACE HR = 0.29 (CI: 0.21-0.40) than those without TACE. After tumor reassessment by RECIST 1.1 criteria following the first TACE, patients with complete response achieved longer survival [HR = 0.15 (CI: 0.04-0.56, P = 0.005)]. Eighty-two patients were treated with sorafenib, mostly BCLC-B and C (87.8%). However, 12.2% were BCLC-D. Median survival with sorafenib was 4.5 mo (IQR 2.3-11.7 mo); which was lower among BCLC-D patients 3.2 mo (IQR 2.0-14.1 mo). A total of 36 BCLC-B patients presented tumor progression after TACE. In these patients, treatment with sorafenib presented better survival when compared to those patients who received sorafenib without prior TACE [HR = 0.26 (CI: 0.09-0.71); P = 0.013].

Conclusion: In this real setting, our results were lower than expected. This highlights unmet needs in Argentina, prior to the introduction of new treatments for HCC.

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Real-life; Survival; Therapeutics.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Argentina / epidemiology
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / mortality*
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / pathology
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / therapy
  • Chemoembolization, Therapeutic*
  • Disease Progression
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Liver Neoplasms / mortality*
  • Liver Neoplasms / pathology
  • Liver Neoplasms / therapy
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Phenylurea Compounds / administration & dosage*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quinolines / administration & dosage*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sorafenib / administration & dosage*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Phenylurea Compounds
  • Quinolines
  • Sorafenib
  • lenvatinib