Correction to: Is population structure in the genetic biobank era irrelevant, a challenge, or an opportunity?

Daniel John Lawson; Neil Martin Davies; Simon Haworth; Bilal Ashraf; Laurence Howe; Andrew Crawford; Gibran Hemani; George Davey Smith; Nicholas John Timpson

doi:10.1007/s00439-019-02051-3

Correction to: Is population structure in the genetic biobank era irrelevant, a challenge, or an opportunity?

Hum Genet. 2020 Jan;139(1):43-44. doi: 10.1007/s00439-019-02051-3.

Authors

Daniel John Lawson¹, Neil Martin Davies², Simon Haworth², Bilal Ashraf², Laurence Howe³, Andrew Crawford², Gibran Hemani², George Davey Smith², Nicholas John Timpson²

Affiliations

¹ MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK. dan.lawson@bristol.ac.uk.
² MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
³ Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

Abstract

In the original article publication, there is an incorrect impression that Fig. 1 formed a formal Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) by describing it as a causal model. However, it was not correct if interpreted in this way.

Publication types

Published Erratum

Abstract

Publication types

Grants and funding