Background and purpose: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen is highly sensitive and specific in viremic HCV diagnosis. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of HCV core antigen (HCVcAg) in community-based screening for active HCV infection.
Methods: Between 2017/07 and 2018/07, community-based screenings for active HCV infection with two-step (anti-HCV for screening and HCVRNA for diagnosis) and one-step processes (HCVcAg for screening and diagnosis) were conducted in two districts in Kaohsiung City. While HCVcAg test was positive at ≥3 fmol/L, the lowest level of HCV-RNA detection was 12 IU/mL. We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of two algorithms in identifying active HCV infection.
Results: There were two large-scale screenings using the two-step process with a total of 2452 residents enrolled; while six hundred and forty-four residents participated in continuous small-scale screening with the one-step process. The prevalence of anti-HCV and positive HCVcAg was 3.4% and 2.8%. The viremic rate was 1.4% and 2.8% for two- and one-step processes (p < 0.001). While all positive HCVcAg were viremic, 42.4% of positive anti-HCV patients had viremia. The positive predictive value was 42.2% and 100% for two- and one-step processes in detecting active HCV infection (p < 0.001). In identifying one active HCV infection, the cost was $755.3 and $711.1 dollars for two- and one-step processes respectively.
Conclusion: Compared to the two-step process in community-based screening, continuous screening with the HCVcAg test as a one-step tool for active HCV infection was cost-effective in areas with low seroprevalence of HCV in Taiwan.
Keywords: Community-based screening; Cost-effectiveness; Hepatitis C virus core antigen.
Copyright © 2019 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.