Repetitive movement is common in many occupational contexts. Therefore, cumulative load is a widely recognised risk factor for lowback injury. This study quantified the effect of force weighting factors on cumulative load estimates and injury prediction during cyclic loading. Forty-eight porcine cervical spine motion segments were assigned to experimental groups that differed by average peak compression magnitude (30%, 50% and 70% of predicted tolerance) and amplitude variation (consistent, variable). Cyclic loading was performed at a frequency of 0.5 Hz until fatigue failure occurred. Weighting factors were determined and applied instantaneously. Inclusion of weighting factors resulted in statistically similar cumulative load estimates at injury between variable and consistent loading (p > .071). Further, survivorship was generally greater when the peak compression magnitude was consistent compared to variable. These results emphasise the importance of weighting factors as an equalisation tool for the evaluation of cumulative low back loading exposures in occupational contexts. Practitioner summary: Weighting factors can equalise the risk of injury based on compression magnitude. When weighted, the cumulative compression was similar between consistent and variable cyclic loading protocols, despite being significantly different when unweighted and having similar injury rates. Therefore, assessing representative occupational exposures without evaluating task performance variability may underestimate injury risk. Abbreviations: FSU: functional spinal unit; UCT: ultimate compression tolerance.
Keywords: Cumulative load; compression; endplate; loading pattern; weighting factor.