Repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (RVOS) versus standard care to prevent muscle wasting in critically ill patients (ROSProx):a study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

Trials. 2019 Jul 24;20(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3547-5.

Abstract

Background: Forty per cent of critically ill patients are affected by intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW), to which skeletal muscle wasting makes a substantial contribution. This can impair outcomes in hospital, and can cause long-term physical disability after hospital discharge. No effective mitigating strategies have yet been identified. Application of a repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (RVOS) a limb pressure cuff inducing brief repeated cycles of ischaemia and reperfusion, can limit disuse muscle atrophy in both healthy controls and bed-bound patients recovering from knee surgery. We wish to determine whether RVOS might be effective in mitigating against muscle wasting in the ICU. Given that RVOS can also improve vascular function in healthy controls, we also wish to assess such effects in the critically ill. We here describe a pilot study to assess whether RVOS application is safe, tolerable, feasible and acceptable for ICU patients.

Methods: This is a randomised interventional feasibility trial. Thirty-two ventilated adult ICU patients with multiorgan failure will be recruited within 48 h of admission and randomised to either the intervention arm or the control arm. Intervention participants will receive RVOS twice daily (except only once on day 1) for up to 10 days or until ICU discharge. Serious adverse events and tolerability (pain score) will be recorded; feasibility of trial procedures will be assessed against pre-specified criteria and acceptability by semi-structured interview. Together with vascular function, muscle mass and quality will be assessed using ultrasound and measures of physical function at baseline, on days 6 and 11 of study enrolment, and at ICU and hospital discharge. Blood and urine biomarkers of muscle metabolism, vascular function, inflammation and DNA damage/repair mechanism will also be analysed. The Health questionnaire will be completed 3 months after hospital discharge.

Discussion: If this study demonstrates feasibility, the derived data will be used to inform the design (and sample size) of an appropriately-powered prospective trial to clarify whether RVOS can help preserve muscle mass/improve vascular function in critically ill patients.

Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN44340629. Registered on 26 October 2017.

Keywords: Blood flow restriction; Critical illness; ICU-acquired weakness; Muscle atrophy; Rehabilitation; Repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus; Vascular dysfunction.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial Protocol

MeSH terms

  • Critical Illness
  • England
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Humans
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic
  • Muscle Weakness / diagnosis
  • Muscle Weakness / physiopathology
  • Muscle Weakness / prevention & control*
  • Muscle, Skeletal / blood supply*
  • Muscular Atrophy / diagnosis
  • Muscular Atrophy / physiopathology
  • Muscular Atrophy / prevention & control*
  • Pilot Projects
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Regional Blood Flow
  • Therapeutic Occlusion / adverse effects
  • Therapeutic Occlusion / methods*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome