Selective vs Complete Sampling in Hysterectomy Specimens Performed for Atypical Hyperplasia

Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Oct 7;152(5):666-674. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz098.

Abstract

Objectives: Atypical hyperplasia of the endometrium is a significant risk factor for uterine endometrioid carcinoma (EC) and an indication for hysterectomy. Standard sampling of these specimens includes evaluation of the entire endometrium to identify possible EC. We evaluated a method of selective sampling in an effort to balance resource utilization with diagnostic accuracy in the detection of EC.

Methods: Histologic diagnoses based on selective sampling (exclusion of every other block of endometrium) were compared with the original diagnosis based on complete sampling.

Results: Double-blinded review of these cases using selective sampling detected EC in 92% of hysterectomies, including all high-grade/high-stage carcinomas. Selective sampling had an 82% agreement with the original diagnoses, with most discordant diagnoses attributable to interobserver variability. Adjusting for interobserver variability increased diagnostic agreement between selective and complete sampling to 96%.

Conclusions: Selective sampling is a feasible method to save time and resources while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

Keywords: Atypical hyperplasia; Endometrial carcinoma; Hysterectomy; Selective sampling; Value-based payment model.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Biopsy / methods
  • Diagnostic Errors / prevention & control
  • Endometrial Hyperplasia / pathology*
  • Endometrial Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Endometrium / pathology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hysterectomy*
  • Middle Aged
  • Observer Variation
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Specimen Handling / methods*
  • Treatment Outcome