Methodological challenges in constructing DNA methylation risk scores

Epigenetics. 2020 Jan-Feb;15(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2019.1644879. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

Abstract

Polygenic approaches often access more variance of complex traits than is possible by single variant approaches. For genotype data, genetic risk scores (GRS) are widely used for risk prediction as well as in association and interaction studies. Recently, interest has been growing in transferring GRS approaches to DNA methylation data (methylation risk scores, MRS), which can be used 1) as biomarkers for environmental exposures, 2) in association analyses in which single CpG sites do not achieve significance, 3) as dimension reduction approach in interaction and mediation analyses, and 4) to predict individual risks of disease or treatment success. Most GRS approaches can directly be transferred to methylation data. However, since methylation data is more sensitive to confounding, e.g. by age and tissue, it is more complex to find appropriate external weights. In this review, we will outline the adaption of current GRS approaches to methylation data and highlight occurring challenges.

Keywords: Polygenic epidemiology; epigenetic risk score; genetic risk scores; polygenic risk scores; prediction models; weighting strategies.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • DNA Methylation*
  • Epigenomics / methods*
  • Epigenomics / standards
  • Genetic Predisposition to Disease*
  • Genetic Testing / methods
  • Genetic Testing / standards
  • Humans
  • Multifactorial Inheritance

Grants and funding

AH received a research fellowship from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; HU 2731/1-1).