Effectiveness and safety of betrixaban extended prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism compared with standard-duration prophylaxis intervention in acute medically ill patients: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis

J Med Econ. 2019 Oct;22(10):1063-1072. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1645679. Epub 2019 Aug 9.

Abstract

Aims: To determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis using US- and Europe-approved anticoagulants relative to extended-duration VTE prophylaxis with betrixaban. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), unfractionated heparin (UFH), fondaparinux sodium and placebo were each compared to betrixaban, as standard-duration VTE prophylaxis for hospitalized, non-surgical patients with acute medical illness at risk of VTE. Materials and methods: A systematic literature review was conducted up to June 2019 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized, non-surgical patients with acute medical illness at risk of VTE. Studies that reported the occurrence of VTE events (including death) and, where possible, major bleeding, from treatment initiation to 20-50 days thereafter were retrieved and extracted. A Bayesian fixed effect network meta-analysis was used to estimate efficacy and safety of betrixaban compared with standard-duration VTE prophylaxis. Results: Seven RCTs were analyzed which compared betrixaban, LMWHs, UFH, fondaparinux sodium, or placebo. There were significantly higher odds (median odds [95% credible interval]) of VTE with LMWHs (1.38 [1.12-1.70]), UFH (1.60 [1.05-2.46]), and placebo (2.37 [1.55-3.66]) compared with betrixaban. There were significantly higher odds of VTE-related death with placebo (7.76 [2.14-34.40]) compared with betrixaban. No significant differences were observed for the odds of major bleeding with all comparators, VTE-related death with any active standard-duration VTE prophylaxis, or of VTE with fondaparinux sodium, compared with betrixaban. Limitations and conclusions: In this indirect comparison, betrixaban was shown to be an effective regimen with relative benefits compared with LMWHs and UFH. This indicates that betrixaban could reduce the burden of VTE in at-risk hospitalized patients with acute medical illness who need extended prophylaxis, though without direct comparative evidence, stronger conclusions cannot be drawn.

Keywords: C10; C11; Venous thromboembolism; betrixaban; network meta-analysis; pre-exposure thromboprophylaxis; primary thromboprophylaxis.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Anticoagulants / therapeutic use
  • Bayes Theorem
  • Benzamides / therapeutic use*
  • Delayed-Action Preparations / therapeutic use*
  • Factor Xa Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Heparin / therapeutic use
  • Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Network Meta-Analysis
  • Patient Safety*
  • Pyridines / therapeutic use*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Venous Thromboembolism / drug therapy*
  • Venous Thromboembolism / prevention & control*

Substances

  • Anticoagulants
  • Benzamides
  • Delayed-Action Preparations
  • Factor Xa Inhibitors
  • Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight
  • Pyridines
  • betrixaban
  • Heparin