Effects of different increments in workload and duration on peak physiological responses during seated upper-body poling

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effects of test protocols with different increments in workload and duration on peak oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O_2peak), and related physiological parameters during seated upper-body poling (UBP).

Methods: Thirteen upper-body trained, male individuals completed four UBP test protocols with increments in workload until volitional exhaustion in a counterbalanced order: 20 W increase/every 30 s, 20 W/60 s, 10 W/30 s and 10 W/60 s. Cardio-respiratory parameters and power output were measured throughout the duration of each test. Peak blood lactate concentration (bLa_peak) was measured after each test.

Results: The mixed model analysis revealed no overall effect of test protocol on [Formula: see text]O_2peak, peak minute ventilation (VE_peak), peak heart rate (HR_peak), bLa_peak (all p ≥ 0.350), whereas an overall effect of test protocol was found on peak power output (PO_peak) (p = 0.0001), respiratory exchange ratio (RER) (p = 0.024) and test duration (p < 0.001). There was no difference in PO_peak between the 20 W/60 s (175 ± 25 W) and 10 W/30 s test (169 ± 27 W; p = 0.092), whereas PO_peak was lower in the 10 W/60 s test (152 ± 21 W) and higher in the 20 W/30 s test (189 ± 30 W) compared to the other tests (all p = 0.001). In addition, RER was 9.9% higher in the 20 W/30 s compared to the 10 W/60 s test protocol (p = 0.003).

Conclusions: The UBP test protocols with different increments in workload and duration did not influence [Formula: see text]O_2peak, and can therefore be used interchangeably when [Formula: see text]O_2peak is the primary outcome. However, PO_peak and RER depend upon the test protocol applied and the UBP test protocols can, therefore, not be used interchangeably when the latter is the primary outcome parameter.

Keywords: Aerobic capacity; Exercise test protocol; Upper-body exercise.