Background: Relations between characteristics and outcomes of patients in Japan with atrial fibrillation (AF) and the type of medical facility providing their outpatient care are unclear.
Methods and results: We compared patient characteristics and outcomes between 2 university hospitals (n=1178), 20 general hospitals (n=1308), and 41 private clinics (n=751) (follow-up: 39.3 months) in the prospective SAKURA AF Registry. Private clinic patients were significantly older than university hospital and general hospital patients (73.4±9.2 vs. 70.3±9.8 and 72.6±8.9 years; p<0.001), and these patients' CHADS2 scores were significantly lower than general hospital, but higher than university hospital patients (1.8±1.1 vs. 2.0±1.2 and 1.6±1.1; p<0.001). The Kaplan-Meier incidences of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) (1.72 vs. 1.58 vs. 0.84 events per 100 patient-years; p=0.120), a cardiovascular event (4.09 vs. 2.44 vs. 1.40; p<0.001), and death were higher (2.39 vs. 2.21 vs. 1.24; p=0.015) for university and general hospital patients than for private clinic patients; the incidences of major bleeding were equivalent (1.78 vs. 1.33 vs. 1.16; p=0.273). After multivariate adjustments, this trend persisted.
Conclusions: Adverse clinical events at small to large hospitals appear to be higher than those at private clinics, suggesting that careful attention for preventing stroke/SE and cardiovascular events should be paid to patients at a university or general hospital.
Keywords: Clinics; Hospitals; Japanese atrial fibrillation; Outcomes.
Copyright © 2019 Japanese College of Cardiology. All rights reserved.