Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;222(1):3-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.043. Epub 2019 Jun 25.

Abstract

Without cesarean delivery, obstructed labor can result in maternal and fetal injuries or even death given a disproportion in size between the fetus and the maternal birth canal. The precise frequency of obstructed labor is difficult to estimate because of the widespread use of cesarean delivery for indications other than proven cephalopelvic disproportion, but it has been estimated that at least 1 million mothers per year are affected by this disorder worldwide. Why is the fit between the fetus and the maternal pelvis so tight? Why did evolution not lead to a greater safety margin, as in other primates? Here we review current research and suggest new hypotheses on the evolution of human childbirth and pelvic morphology. In 1960, Washburn suggested that this obstetrical dilemma arose because the human pelvis is an evolutionary compromise between two functions, bipedal gait and childbirth. However, recent biomechanical and kinematic studies indicate that pelvic width does not considerably affect the efficiency of bipedal gait and thus is unlikely to have constrained the evolution of a wider birth canal. Instead, bipedalism may have primarily constrained the flexibility of the pubic symphysis during pregnancy, which opens much wider in most mammals with large fetuses than in humans. We argue that the birth canal is mainly constrained by the trade-off between 2 pregnancy-related functions: while a narrow pelvis is disadvantageous for childbirth, it offers better support for the weight exerted by the viscera and the large human fetus during the long gestation period. We discuss the implications of this hypothesis for understanding pelvic floor dysfunction. Furthermore, we propose that selection for a narrow pelvis has also acted in males because of the role of pelvic floor musculature in erectile function. Finally, we review the cliff-edge model of obstetric selection to explain why evolution cannot completely eliminate cephalopelvic disproportion. This model also predicts that the regular application of life-saving cesarean delivery has evolutionarily increased rates of cephalopelvic disproportion already. We address how evolutionary models contribute to understanding and decision making in obstetrics and gynecology as well as in devising health care policies.

Keywords: Homo erectus; arrest of descent; arrest of dilatation; bipedalism; cephalopelvic disproportion; cesarean delivery; cliff-edge model; encephalization; erectile dysfunction; evolution; failure to progress in labor; fecal incontinence; fetal head; fistula; mismatch; parturition; pelvic dimensions; pelvic dimorphism; pelvic floor disorder; pelvic inlet; prolapse; starvation during pregnancy; symphysis pubis; urinary incontinence; uterine prolapse; uterine rupture; vaginal prolapse.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biological Evolution*
  • Cephalopelvic Disproportion / epidemiology
  • Cephalopelvic Disproportion / physiopathology*
  • Cephalopelvic Disproportion / surgery
  • Cesarean Section
  • Female
  • Gait / physiology*
  • Hominidae
  • Humans
  • Parturition / physiology*
  • Pelvic Bones / anatomy & histology*
  • Pelvic Bones / physiology
  • Pelvimetry
  • Pelvis / anatomy & histology
  • Pelvis / physiology
  • Pregnancy
  • Pubic Symphysis / anatomy & histology
  • Pubic Symphysis / physiology
  • Selection, Genetic