Multi-disciplinary weight management compared to routine care in youth with obesity: what else should be monitored?

Endocrine. 2019 Aug;65(2):263-269. doi: 10.1007/s12020-019-01988-9. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

Abstract

Purpose: Efficacy of multi-disciplinary weight management (MDM) in youth has not been compared to their routine care.

Objectives: To compare body mass index z-score (zBMI) and blood test (lab) changes (Δ) in youth before and after MDM and to correlate bio-impedance analysis (BIA) and lab measurements.

Methods: We compared zBMI Δ (from referring providers' records), within 3 months prior to MDM, to monthly zBMI Δ after MDM, in a retrospective cohort of youth at a tertiary MDM center. BIA and lab measurements after 6 months, MDM were compared to baseline.

Results: We reviewed 316 records (12.9 ± 3.5 years, 49% males, 104.8 ± 35.1 kgs). The pre-MDM zBMI Δ (0.02 ± 0.1) was reversed after MDM (-0.03 ± 0.09, visit 2, P < 0.001). The zBMI Δ progressed on follow-up (-0.14 ± 0.05, visit 6). Baseline BIA components correlated with Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), triglycerides, and systolic blood pressure. HbA1c, HOMA-IR, and liver functions significantly improved on follow-up. MDM participation showed progressive attrition and dropped to 11.6% at visit 6.

Conclusion: MDM in youth resulted in zBMI and lab improvements compared to their pre-MDM measurements. BIA provided additional outcome measures that correlated with metabolic markers. MDM follow-up was limited by the progressive participant drop-out. Behavioral economic strategies are needed to improve adherence.

Keywords: Bio-impedance analysis; Multi-disciplinary management; Youth with obesity.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Body Composition*
  • Body Mass Index
  • Child
  • Electric Impedance*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pediatric Obesity / blood
  • Pediatric Obesity / therapy*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Weight Reduction Programs / statistics & numerical data*