Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey

F1000Res. 2019 Feb 26:8:221. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.18005.2. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Background: The living systematic review (LSR) is an emerging approach for improved evidence synthesis that uses continual updating to include relevant new evidence as soon as it is published. The objectives of this study are to: 1) assess the methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews using a living study approach; and 2) describe the life cycle of living systematic reviews, i.e., describe the changes over time to their methods and findings. Methods: For objective 1, we will begin by conducting a cross-sectional survey and then update its findings every 6 months by including newly published LSRs. For objective 2, we will conduct a prospective longitudinal follow-up of the cohort of included LSRs. To identify LSRs, we will continually search the following electronic databases: Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane library. We will also contact groups conducting LSRs to identify eligible studies that we might have missed. We will follow the standard systematic review methodology for study selection and data abstraction. For each LSR update, we will abstract information on the following: 1) general characteristics, 2) systematic review methodology, 3) living approach methodology, 4) results, and 5) editorial and publication processes. We will update the findings of both the surveys and the longitudinal follow-up of included LSRs every 6 months. In addition, we will identify articles addressing LSR methods to be included in an 'LSR methods repository'. Conclusion: The proposed living methodological survey will allow us to monitor how the methods of conduct, and reporting as well as the findings of LSRs change over time. Ultimately this should help with ensuring the quality and transparency of LSRs.

Keywords: living systematic review; research methodology; research reporting; study protocol.

MeSH terms

  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Databases, Bibliographic
  • MEDLINE
  • Prospective Studies
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic*

Associated data

  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.7688036

Grants and funding

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.