Cost-effectiveness of dabrafenib and trametinib in combination as adjuvant treatment of BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive melanoma from a US healthcare payer perspective

J Med Econ. 2019 Dec;22(12):1243-1252. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1635487. Epub 2019 Aug 4.

Abstract

Objective: The COMBI-AD trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of dabrafenib and trametinib in combination vs placebo as adjuvant treatment of patients with BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive resected Stage IIIA (lymph node metastasis >1 mm), IIIB, or IIIC melanoma. This analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of dabrafenib and trametinib vs observation from a US healthcare payer perspective.Methods: This evaluation employed a non-homogeneous, semi-Markov, cohort model with health states for relapse-free survival (RFS), post-locoregional recurrence (LR), post-distant recurrence (DR) receiving first-line treatment, and post-DR receiving second-line treatment. A 50-year modeling time horizon was used. Transition probabilities were estimated based on individual patient data (IPD) from the COMBI-AD trial. Health-state utilities were estimated using EuroQol (EQ-5D) index values from COMBI-AD and published sources. Direct medical costs associated with treatment of melanoma were considered, including costs of BRAF mutation testing, medication and administration costs for adjuvant and metastatic treatments, costs of treating recurrence, and costs of adverse events. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted at 3.0% annually.Results: Compared with observation, adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib was estimated to result in a gain of 2.15 QALYs at an incremental cost of $74,518. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated to be $34,689 per QALY. In deterministic sensitivity analyses, the ICER was sensitive to the cost of dabrafenib and trametinib and the distribution used for projecting RFS beyond the end of follow-up in the COMBI-AD trial. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100,000 per QALY, the probability that dabrafenib and trametinib is cost-effective was estimated to be 92%.Conclusions: Given generally-accepted cost-effectiveness threshold values in the US, dabrafenib plus trametinib is likely to be a cost-effective adjuvant therapy for patients with BRAF mutation positive melanoma. These results may be useful for policy-makers in their deliberations regarding reimbursement and access to this treatment.

Keywords: melanoma; Cost-effectiveness; I00; I10; Markov model; dabrafenib; trametinib.

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents / administration & dosage
  • Antineoplastic Agents / economics
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Health Expenditures / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Imidazoles / administration & dosage
  • Imidazoles / economics
  • Imidazoles / therapeutic use*
  • Lymphatic Metastasis
  • Melanoma / drug therapy*
  • Melanoma / pathology
  • Models, Econometric
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Oximes / administration & dosage
  • Oximes / economics
  • Oximes / therapeutic use*
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf / genetics
  • Pyridones / administration & dosage
  • Pyridones / economics
  • Pyridones / therapeutic use*
  • Pyrimidinones / administration & dosage
  • Pyrimidinones / economics
  • Pyrimidinones / therapeutic use*
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Skin Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Skin Neoplasms / pathology

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Imidazoles
  • Oximes
  • Pyridones
  • Pyrimidinones
  • trametinib
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
  • dabrafenib