Objective: Infections are a serious complication of thermal injury. Excision and grafting have led to a decrease in incidence, but to ensure successful skin grafting, antimicrobial irrigants are frequently utilized to prevent infection. A safe, efficacious, and cost-effective irrigant capable of preventing infections would be a valuable adjunctive therapy. The objectives of this study were to determine whether the test article was noninferior to current therapy in controlling infection and reducing postoperative pain in patients with skin graft. Methods: Patients with burns requiring skin grafting were randomized to hypochlorous acid or 5% Sulfamylon solution as topical dressings postoperatively. Inclusion criteria included thermal injury 20% or more total body surface area requiring excision and autografting, and age 18 years or more. Exclusion criteria included pregnant females, chlorine sensitivity, and electrical/chemical/cold injuries. The following outcomes were assessed: patient demographics, graft viability, infection, pain score, narcotic usage, adverse events, and cost. Results: Treatment groups were demographically equivalent. There were no differences in adverse or serious adverse events between the 2 groups. Graft viability and infection rate were equivalent between the 2 groups. In addition, pain scores and narcotic usage were similar. Hypochlorous acid was significantly less expensive than 5% Sulfamylon solution. Conclusions: Hypochlorous acid demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety compared with 5% Sulfamylon when used as the postoperative topical dressing for skin grafts. Hypochlorous acid was more cost-effective. This pilot study was limited by its small sample size. However, hypochlorous acid shows promise as a topical wound dressing and further study with larger groups is warranted.
Keywords: Sulfamylon; healing; hypochlorous acid; pain; skin graft.