Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are increasing due to demographic factors. Increasing life expectancy and sociocultural demands of women require successful treatments that also have low complication rates. Classic open procedures such as colposuspension or colposacropexy (native tissue repair as well as mesh procedures) are experiencing a renaissance due to the current critical view of mesh-repair pelvic floor surgery and continue to be of great importance. With suitable patient selection, long-term results of abdominal procedures are on a par with minimally invasive techniques. Cosmetically acceptable results can be achieved with optimized incisions. The therapeutically relevant target for apical fixation is the elevation angle of the vagina (EAV). Minimally invasive mesh-based primary reconstructions and interventions for POP recurrence proved to be superior to conventional procedures due to good long-term results, lower recurrence rates and reduced early and late complication rates when anatomically correct and gentle surgery is performed with a critical selection of textile implants. Abdominal procedures are not inferior to minimally invasive techniques when instrumental suturing techniques and modern instruments are used. Adequate and critical information about surgical options and possible risks of complications should be provided in a timely manner. Education and training in modern diagnostics as well as in abdominal and current minimally invasive techniques and complication management should be implemented according to the guidelines and recommendations of professional societies, the Food and Drug Administration and the European Network of Information Centres.
Keywords: Laparoscopy; Pelvic floor; Pelvic organ prolapse; Sacral colpopexy; Urinary incontinence.