Center of mass in analysis of dynamic stability during gait following stroke: A systematic review

Gisele Francini Devetak; Roberta Castilhos Detanico Bohrer; André Luiz Felix Rodacki; Elisangela Ferretti Manffra

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.06.006

Center of mass in analysis of dynamic stability during gait following stroke: A systematic review

Gait Posture. 2019 Jul:72:154-166. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 10.

Authors

Gisele Francini Devetak¹, Roberta Castilhos Detanico Bohrer², André Luiz Felix Rodacki³, Elisangela Ferretti Manffra⁴

Affiliations

¹ Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Health Technology Graduation Programm, Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Curitiba, 80215-901, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Hospital de Clínicas, Rua General Carneiro, 181, Curitiba, 80060-900, Brazil. Electronic address: gidevetak@hotmail.com.
² Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Physical Education Department, Rua Coração de Maria, 92, Curitiba, 80215-370, Brazil; Universidade Positivo (UP), Rua Professor Pedro Viriato Parigot de Souza, 530, Curitiba, 81200-452, Brazil. Electronic address: betadetanico@gmail.com.
³ Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Physical Education Department, Rua Coração de Maria, 92, Curitiba, 80215-370, Brazil. Electronic address: rodacki@ufpr.br.
⁴ Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Health Technology Graduation Programm, Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Curitiba, 80215-901, Brazil. Electronic address: elisangela.manffra@pucpr.br.

PMID: 31202025
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.06.006

Abstract

Background: The Center of mass (CoM) analysis reveals important aspects of gait dynamic stability of stroke patients, but the variety of methods and measures represents a challenge for planning new studies.

Research question: How have the CoM measures been calculated and employed to investigate gait stability after a stroke? Three issues were addressed: (i) the methodological aspects of the calculation of CoM measures; (ii) the purposes and (iii) the conclusions of the studies on gait stability that employed those measures.

Methods: PubMed and Science Direct databases have been searched to collect original articles produced until July 2017. A set of 26 studies were selected according to criteria involving their methodological quality.

Results: A compromise between accuracy and feasibility in CoM calculation could be reached using the segmental method with 7-9 segments. Regarding their purposes, two types of studies were identified: clinical and research oriented. From the first ones, we highlighted: the margin of stability (MoS) in the mediolateral (ML) direction, and the angular momentum in the frontal plane could be indicators of dynamical stability; the MoS in the anteroposterior (AP) direction might be able to detect the risk of falls and the symmetry of vertical CoM displacement could be used to analyze energy expenditure during gait. These and other CoM measures are potentially useful in clinical settings, but their psychometric properties are still to be determined. The research oriented studies allowed to clarify that stability is not improved by widening the step in stroke patients and that the impaired control of the non-paretic limb might be the main source of instability.

Significance: This review provides recommendations on the methods for estimating CoM and its measures, identifies the potential usefulness of CoM parameters and indicates issues that could be addressed in future studies.

Keywords: Center of mass; Dynamical stability; Gait; Postural balance; Stroke.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review

MeSH terms

Biomechanical Phenomena
Gait*
Humans
Orientation, Spatial
Postural Balance*
Stroke / physiopathology*