Cost-Effectiveness of Secukinumab Versus Other Biologics in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: An Argentinean Perspective

Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 Dec:20:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 May 16.

Abstract

Objective: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disease. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of secukinumab, an interleukin-17A inhibitor, versus other biologics in PsA from the Argentinean social security perspective.

Methods: A semi-Markov model evaluated subcutaneous (sc) treatment with secukinumab 150 mg and 300 mg against other sc treatments such as adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, ustekinumab, and intravenous treatment infliximab in biologic-naïve (with or without moderate to severe psoriasis) and biologic-experienced PsA patients over a lifetime horizon. Response to treatments was determined using the PsA Response Criteria (PsARC) at 12 weeks. Model inputs were derived from randomized controlled trials, network meta-analyses, published literature, and other Argentinean sources. Model outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Sensitivity analyses and alternative scenarios with a higher cost option were also conducted.

Results: Among biologic-naïve PsA patients without psoriasis, secukinumab 150 mg provided the highest QALYs (7.18) versus all sc biologics at the lowest cost ($3 755 678 Argentine peso), thus dominating them. Among biologic-naïve PsA patients with psoriasis and biologic-experienced PsA patients, secukinumab 300 mg provided highest QALYs (6.99 and 7.53, respectively), dominated infliximab, and was cost-effective versus other sc biologics. Deterministic sensitivity analyses indicated sensitivity of results to variation in PsARC rates, drug acquisition costs, Health Assessment Questionnaire change, and utilities. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed maximum net monetary benefits with both secukinumab doses. Results from an alternative scenario analysis were similar to base-case analysis.

Conclusions: For both biologic-naïve and experienced PsA patients, secukinumab is either a dominant or cost-effective treatment option compared with other biologics in Argentina.

Keywords: Argentina; cost-effectiveness; incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; interleukin-17A inhibitor; psoriatic arthritis; quality-adjusted life year; secukinumab; tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / economics
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / therapeutic use*
  • Antirheumatic Agents / economics
  • Antirheumatic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Argentina
  • Arthritis, Psoriatic / drug therapy*
  • Arthritis, Psoriatic / economics
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Drug Costs / statistics & numerical data
  • Health Care Costs / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Infliximab / economics
  • Infliximab / therapeutic use
  • Markov Chains
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • Antirheumatic Agents
  • Infliximab
  • secukinumab