Consistent condom use among highly effective contraceptive users in an HIV-endemic area in rural Kenya

PLoS One. 2019 May 6;14(5):e0216208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216208. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Background: Women of reproductive age are at the highest risk of both HIV infection and unintended pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa. Highly effective contraceptives (HECs) such as hormonal injectable and implants are widely used in this region. HECs are effective for preventing pregnancies. However, unlike condoms, HECs offer no protection against HIV. Dual-method use, or the use of condoms with HECs, is an ideal option to reduce HIV risk but is infrequently practiced. Rather, women tend not to use condoms when they use HECs and increase their HIV risk from their sexual partners. However, it remains unknown whether HIV status affects such tendency. Given the increasing popularity of HECs in sub-Saharan Africa, this study examined the association between the use of HECs and condom use among HIV-positive and negative women.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 833 sexually active women aged 18-49 years, recruited from six clinics in Siaya county, Kenya. From March to May 2017, female research assistants interviewed the women using a structured questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the association between HEC use and consistent condom use in the past 90 days, adjusting for potential confounders. It was also examined with regular partners (husbands or live-in partners) and non-regular partners, separately. In addition, a sub-sample analysis of HIV-negative or unknown women was conducted.

Results: In total, 735 women were available for the analysis. Among the women, 231 (31.4%) were HIV-positive. HIV-positive women were more likely to use HECs than HIV-negative or status unknown women (70.1% vs. 61.7%, p = 0.027). HEC use was significantly associated with decreased condom use with a regular partner (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.25; 95% CI 0.15-0.43, p<0.001) and a non-regular partner (AOR = 0.25; 95% CI 0.11-0.58, p = 0.001). However, compared with HIV-negative or status unknown women, HIV-positive women were more likely to use HECs and condoms consistently with a regular partner (AOR = 6.54, 95% CI 2.15-20.00, p = 0.001). Other factors significantly associated with consistent condom use included partner's positive attitude toward contraception, partner's HIV-positive status, high HIV risk perception, and desire for children in the future.

Conclusion: Dual-method use was limited among HIV-negative women and women who had HIV-negative partners due to inconsistent condom use. The use of HECs was significantly associated with decreased condom use, regardless of partner type and their HIV status. Due to this inverse association, HIV-negative women may increase their HIV risk from their sexual partners. Therefore, interventions should be strengthened to reduce their dual risks of HIV infection and unintended pregnancy by promoting dual-method use. Family planning services should strengthen counseling on the possible risk of HIV infection from their sexual partners and target not only women but also their partners, who may play a key role in condom use.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Condoms / statistics & numerical data*
  • Contraception Behavior / statistics & numerical data
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • HIV Infections / psychology*
  • HIV Seronegativity
  • HIV Seropositivity / epidemiology
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Humans
  • Kenya / epidemiology
  • Logistic Models
  • Middle Aged
  • Rural Population / statistics & numerical data*
  • Safe Sex / statistics & numerical data*
  • Sexual Partners
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Unsafe Sex / psychology
  • Unsafe Sex / statistics & numerical data
  • Young Adult

Associated data

  • Dryad/10.5061/dryad.182j38r

Grants and funding

HK received scholarship grants from the Global Leadership Training Program of the United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (Tokyo, Japan; https://ias.unu.edu/en/research/global-leadership-training-programme-in-africa-gltp.html) and Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development (Tokyo, Japan; http://www.fasid.or.jp/e_activities/3_index_detail.shtml). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.