Safety gaps in medical team communication: Results of quality improvement efforts in a cardiac catheterization laboratory

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan;95(1):136-144. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28298. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess closed-loop communications (readback), a fundamental aspect of effective communication, among cardiovascular teams and assess improvement efforts.

Background: Effective communication within teams is essential to assure safety and optimal outcomes. Readback of verbal physician orders is a hospital and national requirement.

Methods: Single-center observational study, where the readback responses to physician verbal orders in the catheterization laboratory were characterized over three distinct time intervals from 2015 to 2017. Performance feedback and focused education on the value of readbacks was provided to the teams in two waves, with subsequent remeasurement. Responses to verbal orders were characterized as complete (all important parameters of the order repeated for verification), partial, acknowledgement only, or no response. Changes in readback performance after quality interventions were assessed.

Results: During the first-observational period of 101 cases, complete readback occurred in 195 of 515 (38%) medication orders and 136 of 235 (58%) equipment orders. After initial quality improvement efforts, 102 cases were observed. In these, 298 of 480 (62%) medication orders had complete readback, and 210 of 420 (50%) equipment orders had complete readback. After additional quality improvement efforts, 168 cases were observed. In these, 506 of 723 (70%) medication orders had complete readback, and 630 of 1,061 (59%) equipment orders had complete readback. Overall, medication order readback improved over time (correlation = 0.26 [-0.30, -0.21]; p < 0.001), but equipment order readback did not (correlation = 0.02 [-0.07, 0.03]; p = 0.44).

Conclusions: Closed-loop communication of physician verbal orders was used infrequently in this medical team setting and proved difficult to fully improve. This is an important safety gap.

Keywords: medical errors/prevention and control; medical order entry systems/standards; patient safety.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Cardiac Catheterization* / adverse effects
  • Cooperative Behavior
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Humans
  • Interdisciplinary Communication*
  • Medical Errors / prevention & control
  • Medical Order Entry Systems
  • Patient Care Team / organization & administration*
  • Patient Safety
  • Professional Practice Gaps*
  • Quality Improvement*
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care*
  • Teach-Back Communication*
  • Verbal Behavior*