Purpose of review: We summarize the recent literature on the use of different animal models for testing existing and new materials for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Recent findings: A wide spectrum of animal models is being used in urogynecology, both for the study of physiologic and pathophysiologic processes, training in surgical procedures, yet mainly to study the host response to implant materials. The quality of studies is variable, and procedures, read-outs, and reporting are not standardized. This makes comparison very difficult. The research community is experimenting with different knitting patterns, novel polymers, bioactivation, as well as resorbable rather than durable implants. Outcomes of the experiments are dependent on the location of implantation. Lighter polypropylene constructs seem to induce a less vigorous host response than elder heavier products. Modification of the surface yields contradictory findings. Resorbable acellular collagen matrices may be reintroduced as prophylactically inserted support structures.
Summary: Although animal experimentation with novel candidate implants is advocated, there is a lack of standardization in reporting. The concept of resorbable construct is being revived, as durable materials have caused clinical graft-related complications. Large animal experiments seem to provide interesting and more comprehensive information, yet their use may be contested.