[Application of ultrasound-guided hip joint drug injection in the postoperative rehabilitation of arthroscopie repair of acetabular labral tears]

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Apr 18;51(2):265-267. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.02.012.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To explore the clinical application of ultrasound-guided hip joint drug injection in the postoperative rehabilitation of arthroscopie repair of acetabular labral tears.

Methods: This research retrospectively analyzed a total of 38 hips from 36 patients (2 of them were bilateral) whose imaging examination showed acetabular labral well healed but the rehabilitating training was limited due to hip pain after arthroscopie repair of acetabular labral tears in our hospital between June 2015 and May 2017. All the patients underwent ultrasound-guided hip joint drug injection treatment. Through comparing the pain and the function of hip before and after drug injection, the clinical application values of ultrasound-guided hip joint drug injection in the postoperative rehabilitation of arthroscopie repair of acetabular labral tears were explored. The degree of hip pain was assessed by visual analogue score (VAS), which were scored before and after the injection. The hip function was assessed by the hip range of activity. The SPSS 21.0 statistical software was used for the data analysis. The effective rate of hip injection was calculated, which was defined as: ("excellent" + "good")/total number of cases×100%. The degree of hip pain was assessed by VAS, which was divided into 0 to 10 points with 0 for no pain and 10 for unbearable severe pain. The function of hip was assessed by the hip range of activity. The therapeutic effect of "excellent" meant no pain or occasional slight pain in the hip, along with Patrick test was negative and hip joint was not limited; the therapeutic effect of "good" meant that the pain was significantly reduced, and the hip's activity was slightly restricted. "No effect" meant that the pain of hip was not relieved, and the Patrick test was positive.

Results: The VAS score of the patient before drug injection was 5.46±1.46, and the VAS score was 2.01±0.53 after drug injection 4 weeks later. The score of the latter was significantly lower than that of the former, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The hip joint activity after ultrasound-guided hip joint drug injection was significantly improved. The therapeutic effective rate was 84.2%.

Conclusion: For patients with hip pain and limitations after arthroscopie repair of acetabular labral tears, ultrasound-guided drug injection can effectively reduce hip pain, improve hip activity, and promote hip functional reconstruction.

目的: 探讨超声引导下髋关节药物注射在髋关节镜盂唇修复术后促进康复中的临床应用。

方法: 纳入2015年6月至2017年5月于北京大学第三医院行髋关节镜盂唇修复术,术后1~6个月[平均(2.3±0.6)个月]仍有髋部疼痛导致康复期康复训练受限,但影像学检查显示盂唇愈合良好的36例患者,其中2例患者为双侧,共计38侧髋关节,行超声引导下髋关节疼痛阻滞治疗。对注射治疗前及治疗后满4周时患者髋部疼痛程度进行评分,应用SPSS 21.0统计学软件进行数据分析,同时随访患者髋关节功能状况,计算髋关节药物注射治疗的有效率[有效率=(“优良”+“好转”)例数/总例数×100%]。髋部疼痛程度评估采用视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue score, VAS)评估,疼痛程度分为0~10分,0分为无疼痛感,10分为难以忍受的剧烈疼痛。髋关节功能状况通过髋关节活动度进行评估。疗效“优良”指髋部无疼痛或偶有轻微疼痛,Patrick试验转阴性,运动功能不受限;“好转”指疼痛明显减轻,运动功能稍受限;“无效”指治疗前后疼痛和运动功能无明显改善,Patrick试验阳性。

结果: 在接受髋关节药物注射治疗前,患者髋部疼痛程度VAS评分为(5.46±1.46)分,注射治疗后满4周时VAS评分为(2.01±0.53)分,VAS值明显减低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);药物注射治疗后,髋关节活动度有明显提高,治疗有效率为84.2%。

结论: 对髋关节镜盂唇修复术后仍存在疼痛、功能受限的患者,行超声引导下髋关节药物注射可有效减轻髋部疼痛,改善髋关节活动度,促进髋关节功能重建。

MeSH terms

  • Acetabulum
  • Arthroscopy
  • Cartilage, Articular*
  • Hip Joint
  • Humans
  • Retrospective Studies

Grants and funding

北京大学第三医院临床重点项目及(Y75478-03); 首都临床特色应用研究与成果推广项目(Z151100004015092)