The clinical significance of single or double bands in cerebrospinal fluid isoelectric focusing. A retrospective study and systematic review

PLoS One. 2019 Apr 15;14(4):e0215410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215410. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Background: The presence of ≥3 oligoclonal bands (OCB) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) without corresponding bands in serum represents a definite pathological pattern, whereas the clinical significance of 1-2 CSF bands (borderline pattern) is poorly investigated.

Methods: We screened 1986 consecutive CSF and serum samples which were collected over a four-year time period and had results of isoelectric focusing (IEF) available. Of patients with borderline OCB we reviewed individual medical charts for assessment of clinical diagnoses. Where feasible, IEF was replicated and results of follow-up samples were obtained. IEF was performed using polyacrylamide gel followed by immunoblotting and IgG-specific antibody staining. Additionally, we performed a systematic literature review of the diagnostic specificity of OCB using different cut-offs for CSF-restricted bands.

Results: Out of 253 patients with borderline OCB, 21.7% had an inflammatory neurological disease (IND) of the central nervous system, comprising 4% multiple sclerosis patients, and 14.2% had a peripheral IND, whereas the remaining 64.1% of patients showed non-inflammatory diseases. Frequency of one or two CSF bands without corresponding serum bands did not differ between the disease groups. In a subgroup of 100 patients IEF was repeated. Of those, 73% were OCB negative, while no sample was positive. In 26 patients IEF results were available of a follow-up sample collected after a median of 27 months. Of those, 4 (15.4%) turned positive. Systematic literature review revealed a diagnostic specificity of OCB of 97% and 92% using a cut-off ≥3 and ≥2 CSF bands in patients with mainly non-inflammatory neurological diseases.

Conclusion: The clinical significance of one or two CSF-restricted bands is moderate and, hence, indicates a possible but not reliable proof of intrathecal B-cell activity. Sample re-testing, introduction of an additional diagnostic category, e.g. "possible intrathecal IgG synthesis", and follow-up lumbar puncture might be possible options to address this scenario.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Cerebrospinal Fluid / metabolism*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Isoelectric Focusing
  • Male
  • Nervous System Diseases / cerebrospinal fluid*
  • Retrospective Studies

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.