Two diagrammatic ordinal scales are available in the Estimate app (2017 version) for Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) severity on table beet: 10% linear (linear-based diagrammatic scale [LIN]) and logarithmic based (Horsfall-Barratt [HB]). These allow for estimating severity data of four types depending on the system used. A group of 30 raters assigned percentage severity on 30 photographs of diseased table beet leaves during five rounds first without an aid and then using each of the four rating systems in Estimate. In two, the perceived ordinal score of the HB or LIN scale was assigned where severity of the subject fit best. HB2 and LIN2 involved a second choice of unitary severity within the perceived score interval. There was large variation in unaided ability of raters to estimate severity: 13% were accurate (Lin's concordance correlation [LCC] > 0.9), 23% were inaccurate (LCC < 0.7), and the remaining had moderate accuracy. Larger disparities between assigned and actual ordinal scores (mostly overestimates) occurred using the LIN compared with the HB. The LIN2 produced the most accurate estimates (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, ρc = 0.96; generalized bias parameter, Cb = 0.99; Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.95) and the greatest interrater reliability (overall concordance correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.93). The two-step process using the 10% linear scale is recommended for severity estimates of CLS in table beet.