Introduction: We tested the hypothesis that individual susceptibility to freezing cold injury might be reflected in an attenuated cold-induced vasodilatation (CIVD) response by comparing the CIVD responses of an elite alpinist with a history of freezing cold injury in the feet (case alpinist) with those of an age- and ability- matched noninjured alpinists control group (controls). According to this hypothesis, the vasomotor responses to a CIVD test of the case alpinist would represent a pathophysiological response when compared with the normal physiological response of a noninjured cohort.
Methods: The case alpinist and the controls in the cohort group conducted a cold water immersion test comprising sequential immersion of a hand and foot for 5 min in 35°C water, followed by a 30-min immersion in 8°C water and a 10-min recovery period in room air. During this test we monitored the finger and toe skin temperatures.
Results: The case alpinist had a significantly attenuated CIVD response and a lower skin temperature in all injured and noninjured digits during immersion (∼2°C lower than in the control group) and an attenuated recovery of finger skin temperatures (∼6°C lower than in the control group).
Conclusions: The attenuated CIVD response of the case alpinist may reflect a previously unrecognized enhanced susceptibility to frostbite. In addition to the poor vasomotor response observed in the injured toes, he also exhibited a poor vasomotor response in his noninjured fingers. The results of the present study indicate that a test of vasomotor activity during thermal stress may identify individuals predisposed to cold injury.
Keywords: cold-induced vasodilatation; freezing cold injury; frostbite; mountaineering; risk index.
Copyright © 2019 Wilderness Medical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.