Endoscopic vacuum therapy for postoperative esophageal leak

BMC Surg. 2019 Apr 11;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0497-5.

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leak is the most common and serious complication following esophagectomy. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) is a promising method for treating anastomotic leak. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EVAC and to identify factors associated with longer treatment duration for esophageal anastomotic leak following esophagectomy for cancer.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 20 esophageal cancer patients who had undergone EVAC for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. The efficacy and success rates were evaluated and factors associated with longer treatment duration (≥ 21 days) were identified.

Results: All 20 patients were male. Of these, 10 (50.0%) received neoadjuvant treatment and 6 (30.0%) had one or more comorbidities. The median size of fistula opening was 1.75 cm. During a median of 14.5 days of EVAC treatment, a median of 5 interventions were performed. Treatment success was achieved in 19 patients (95.0%). Neoadjuvant treatment was significantly associated with longer EVAC treatment. There was a non-significant trend toward the need for longer treatment duration for a larger fistula opening size.

Conclusions: EVAC treatment is a good non-surgical option for anastomotic leak following esophagectomy. Long duration of treatment is associated with neoadjuvant treatment and a large leakage opening.

Keywords: Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure; Esophagectomy; Leak.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Anastomotic Leak / etiology
  • Anastomotic Leak / surgery*
  • Endoscopy / adverse effects
  • Endoscopy / methods*
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Esophagectomy / adverse effects*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy / adverse effects
  • Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy / methods*
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy / adverse effects
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Failure
  • Treatment Outcome