Comparison of shallow-water seston among biogenic habitats on tidal flats

PeerJ. 2019 Apr 2:7:e6616. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6616. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Aquatic structure-formers have the potential to establish mosaics of seston in shallow water if they modify the relative amounts of deposition (or filtration) and resuspension of particles. By sampling surface water adjacent to Lagrangian drifters traveling 0.1 to 2 m above the bottom, we tested the modification of seston in water masses flowing over two biogenic marine species (native eelgrass, Zostera marina; introduced oysters, Crassostrea gigas) in comparison to unstructured tidal flats. Water properties were examined at five intertidal sites in Washington State, USA, each with 27 drifts (three drifts at different stages of the tidal cycle in each of three patches of three habitat types; drift distance 116 m (109SD), duration 24 min (15SD)). At the initiation of each drift, habitat differences in water properties were already apparent: chlorophyll-a and total suspended solid (TSS) concentrations were greater in structured habitats than bare, and TSS was also inversely related to water depth. Water flowed more slowly across eelgrass than other habitat types. As water flowed across each habitat type, TSS generally increased, especially in shallow water, but without habitat differences; chlorophyll-a in these surface-water samples showed no consistent change during drifts. At higher TSS concentrations, quality in terms of organic content declined, and this relationship was not habitat-specific. However, quality in terms of chlorophyll-a concentration increased with TSS, as well as being greater in water over eelgrass than over other habitat types. These results support widespread mobilization of seston in shallow water ebbing or flooding across Washington State's tidal flats, especially as water passes into patches of biogenic species.

Keywords: Biogenic; Ecosystem engineers; Flow; Oysters; Seagrass; Seston; Top-down control.

Grants and funding

Funding was provided by the Washington Department of Natural Resources through interagency agreement with the University of Washington (IAA 14-164). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.