Immunotherapy in first-line for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: <br>a cost-effective choice?

Recenti Prog Med. 2019 Mar;110(3):138-143. doi: 10.1701/3132.31141.

Abstract

Introduction: The present evaluation was restricted to pivotal phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in first-line for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and methods: We calculated the pharmacological costs necessary to get the benefit in overall survival (OS), for each trial.

Results: Our analysis evaluated 10 phase III RCTs, including 9485 patients. The most relevant increase of cost € per month of OS-gain was associated with bevacizumab (66,720 €) and the lowest with the use of pembrolizumab (2734 €).

Conclusion: Combining pharmacological costs of drugs with the measure of efficacy represented by OS, pembrolizumab is a cost-effective first-line treatment for patients with metastatic NSCLC.

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological / administration & dosage*
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological / economics
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / drug therapy*
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / economics
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / immunology
  • Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Drug Costs
  • Humans
  • Immunotherapy / economics
  • Immunotherapy / methods*
  • Lung Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Lung Neoplasms / economics
  • Lung Neoplasms / immunology
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Survival Rate

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological