Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Versus Posterior Laminoplasty for Cervical Oppressive Myelopathy Secondary to Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Meta-analysis

Orthopedics. 2019 May 1;42(3):e309-e316. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190403-04. Epub 2019 Apr 9.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effect of anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion vs laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. The outcome measures included the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, neurological recovery rate, and complication rate. Subgroup A represented studies with the mean preoperative canal occupying ratio being less than 50%, whereas subgroup B represented studies with the mean canal occupying ratio being 50% or greater. In subgroup A, no difference was found between the 2 groups in the postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and neurological recovery rate. In subgroup B, the anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion group had a higher postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and neurological recovery rate. The authors recommend anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament when the canal occupying ratio is 50% or greater, and they prefer laminoplasty when the canal occupying ratio is less than 50%. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(3):e309-e316.].

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cervical Vertebrae / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Laminoplasty*
  • Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament / complications
  • Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament / surgery*
  • Spinal Cord Compression / etiology
  • Spinal Cord Compression / surgery*
  • Spinal Fusion*