Patients with poorly differentiated endometrial cancer show poor prognosis, and effective molecular target-based therapies are needed. Endometrial cancer cells proliferate depending on the activation of HES1 (hairy and enhancer of split-1), which is induced by several pathways, such as the Notch and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling pathways. In addition, aberrant, ligand-free activation of the FGFR signaling pathway resulting from mutations in FGFR2 was also reported in endometrial cancer. However, a clinical trial showed that there was no difference in the effectiveness of FGFR inhibitors between patients with and without the FGFR2 mutation, suggesting a presence of another signaling pathway for the FGFR activation. Here, we investigated the signaling pathway regulating the expression of HES1 and proliferation of poorly and well-differentiated endometrial cancer cell lines Ishikawa and HEC-50B, respectively. Whereas Ishikawa cells proliferated and expressed HES1 in a Notch signaling-dependent manner, Notch signaling was not involved in HES1 and proliferation of HEC-50B cells. The FGFR inhibitor, NVP-BGJ398, decreased HES1 expression and proliferation of HEC-50B cells; however, HEC50B cells had no mutations in the FGFR2 gene. Instead, HEC-50B cells highly expressed ligands for FGFR2, suggesting that FGFR2 is activated by an autocrine manner, not by ligand-free activation. This autocrine pathway activated Akt downstream of FGFR for cell proliferation. Our findings suggest the usefulness of HES1 as a marker for the proliferation signaling and that FGFR inhibitor may be effective for poorly differentiated endometrial cancers that harbor wild-type FGFR.
Keywords: Endometrial cancer; FGF/FGFR; FGFR2; HES1; NVP-BGJ398.