A comparison of match-physical demands between different tactical systems: 1-4-5-1 vs 1-3-5-2

PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0214952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214952. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

The team tactical system and distribution of the football players on the pitch is considered fundamental in team performance. The present study used time-motion analysis and triaxial-accelerometers to obtain new insights about the impact of different tactical systems (1-4-5-1 and 1-3-5-2) on physical performance, across different playing positions, in a professional football team. Player performance data in fifteen official home matches was collected for analysis. The sample included twenty-two players from five playing positions (centre backs: n = 4; full-back/wide midfielder/ wing-back: n = 9; centre midfielder: n = 6 and centre forward: n = 3), making a total of 108 match observations. A novel finding was that general match physical demands do not differ considerably between these tactical formations, probably because match-to-match variability (variation of players' running profile from match-to-match) might be higher than the differences in physical performance between tactical systems. However, change of formation had a different impact across playing positions, with centre backs playing in 1-4-5-1 performing significant more HIRcounts than in 1-3-5-2 (p = 0.031). Furthermore, a medium effect size (r = 0.33) was observed in HIRdist, with wide players covering higher distances when playing in 1-3-5-2 than in 1-4-5-1. These findings may help coaches to develop individualised training programs to meet the demands of each playing position according to the tactical system adopted.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Athletes*
  • Athletic Performance / physiology*
  • Football / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Running / physiology*

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.