Springs drive downstream nitrate export from artificially-drained agricultural headwater catchments

Brandon C Goeller; Catherine M Febria; Helen J Warburton; Kristy L Hogsden; Kathryn E Collins; Hayley S Devlin; Jon S Harding; Angus R McIntosh

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.308

Springs drive downstream nitrate export from artificially-drained agricultural headwater catchments

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 25:671:119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.308. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

Authors

Brandon C Goeller¹, Catherine M Febria², Helen J Warburton², Kristy L Hogsden², Kathryn E Collins², Hayley S Devlin², Jon S Harding², Angus R McIntosh²

Affiliations

¹ School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand. Electronic address: Brandon.Goeller@niwa.co.nz.
² School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.

PMID: 30928741
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.308

Abstract

Excessive nutrient loading from small agricultural headwaters can substantially degrade downstream water quality and ecological conditions. But, our understanding of the scales and locations to implement nutrient attenuation tools within these catchments is poor. To help inform farm- and catchment-scale management, we quantified nitrate export in nine one-kilometre-long lowland agricultural headwaters fed by tile and open tributary drains in a region with high groundwater nitrate (<1 to >15 mg L^-1 NO₃-N) over four years. Across-catchment differences in upstream spring water nitrate concentrations predicted differences in annual nitrate loads at catchment outlets (range <1-72 megagrams NO₃-N 365 d^-1), and nitrate loads were higher in wet seasons and wet years, reflecting strong groundwater influences. Partitioning the sources of variability in catchment nitrate fluxes revealed that ~60% of variation was accounted for by a combination of fluxes from up-stream springs and contributions from tile and open tributary drains (46% and 15%, respectively), with ~40% of unexplained residual variation likely due to groundwater upwellings. Although tile and open tributary drains contributed comparatively less to catchment loads (tile drains: <0.01 and up to 50 kg NO₃-N d^-1; open drains: <5 kg and up to 100 kg NO₃-N d^-1), mitigation targeted at these localised, farm-scale sources will contribute to decreasing downstream nitrate fluxes. However, high nitrate loads from groundwater mean current NO₃-N waterway management and rehabilitation practices targeting waterway stock exclusion by fencing alone will be insufficient to reduce annual NO₃-N export. Moreover, managing catchment nutrient fluxes will need to acknowledge contributions from groundwater as well as farm-scale losses from land. Overall, our results highlight how nutrient fluxes in spring-fed waterways can be highly dynamic, dominated more by groundwater than local run-off, and point to the scales and locations where nitrate attenuation tools should be implemented.

Keywords: Agricultural land-use; Groundwater; Headwater catchments; Nitrate‑nitrogen flux; Subsurface drainage.