Complications of Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2019 Mar;8(1):60-64. doi: 10.15420/aer.2018.72.2.

Abstract

Since the cryoballoon (CB) was introduced into clinical practice, more than 400,000 patients have undergone a pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with a CB throughout the world. Although the efficacy of the first-generation CB was limited, the recently introduced second-generation CB has achieved a greater uniformity in cooling, which has facilitated a shorter time to PV isolation, shorter procedural times, higher rates of freedom from atrial fibrillation and low rates of PV reconnections. Currently, a single short freeze strategy with a single 28 mm balloon has become the standard technique based on the balance of procedural efficacy and safety. However, enhanced cooling characteristics may also result in a greater potential for collateral damage to non-cardiac structures. Knowledge about the potential complications is essential when performing the procedure. In this article, we describe the important complications that should be noted during a CB procedure, and how to minimise the risk of complications based on our experience.

Keywords: Cryoballoon; atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; complications; pulmonary vein isolation.

Publication types

  • Review