Video counseling about emergency contraception: an observational study

Contraception. 2019 Jul;100(1):54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Mar 23.

Abstract

Objective: This study assesses emergency contraception (EC) dispensed before and after a 3-min video counseling intervention on EC.

Methods: We used a quasi-experimental design and two data sources to assess the impact of offering the video counseling intervention. We used electronic health records from six Planned Parenthood Association of Utah health centers with onsite oral EC dispensing to determine pre- and postintervention EC distribution. Beginning July 2015, three participating locations offered the video counseling intervention to English-speaking EC clients. These clients completed a brief survey assessing EC knowledge and uptake, providing a patient-level data source. We used a difference-in-difference analysis of the clinic-level data to assess the effect of the video counseling intervention. This analysis compares the variation in oral EC distribution between clinics offering the video intervention and clinics not offering the video counseling before and after the video counseling was introduced. Multivariable logistic regression assessed client characteristics associated with receiving ulipristal.

Results: The six health centers served 8269 English-language EC clients during 2015. At participating sites, provision of ulipristal increased from 12% (269/2315) preintervention to 28% (627/2266) postintervention (p<.001). Nonparticipating sites did not see a change. Clients seeking EC at sites offering video counseling were more likely to receive ulipristal even after controlling for age, insurance and ethnicity (adjusted OR 3.4, 95% CI 3.0-3.9). Using the difference-in-difference analysis, the video counseling intervention accounted for an 18% (95% CI 14%-21%) increase in ulipristal provision at the participating health centers. Among the 2266 women seeking EC who were offered video counseling, 19% (425/2266) watched the video, and 60% (254/425) reported the video affected their EC preferences. Knowledge of the IUD for EC increased, but reported uptake of this method remained low (6.8%).

Conclusions: Exposure to video counseling increased use of more effective oral EC and increased knowledge about all EC options.

Implications: Use of a brief informational video about EC options at family planning clinics may increase the proportion of EC clients receiving more effective EC methods.

Keywords: Difference-in-difference analysis; Emergency contraception; Knowledge; Satisfaction; Video decision support tool.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Observational Study
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Contraception, Postcoital*
  • Contraceptives, Oral / administration & dosage
  • Counseling*
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Humans
  • Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Norpregnadienes / administration & dosage
  • Patient Education as Topic*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Utah
  • Video Recording*
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Contraceptives, Oral
  • Norpregnadienes
  • ulipristal