Mid- to long-term outcomes of the 'anatomical approach' to congenital megaprepuce repair

Abstract

Introduction: The understanding of the aetiopathogenesis and the long-term outcomes of correctional repair of congenital megaprepuce (CMP) remains unestablished. Different techniques have been described; however, optimum results have been difficult to achieve.

Objective: The aim of our study was to review our experience of the 'anatomical approach' to the correction of CMP.

Material and methods: This is a retrospective review of boys who underwent CMP repair between 2003 and 2014. All of them had the anatomical approach: A curved incision is made between the scrotal and penile skin. Circumferential dissection superficial to Buck's fascia frees the penis and allows the scrotum to assume a more caudal position. The dissection distally lifts the preputial sac that is opened ventrally. The redundant inner preputial skin is excised. After full degloving, the dorsal flap of skin is thinned. The base of the flap is anchored, and the rectangle of skin is wrapped around the shaft. The remaining diamond-shaped incision is closed in a vertical line. Postoperatively, foam dressings and urethral catheter are left in place. Symptomatology, hospital stay, postoperative complications, redosurgery, voiding and cosmesis were evaluated.

Results: Sixty-one patients had surgery at 5-151 months (median 17 months). Median hospital stay was 24 h (12-168 h). Foam dressings and urethral catheter were used in 47 boys and removed in outpatient clinic after 3-7 days. There were two immediate postoperative complications requiring surgery. One due to severe oedema and constriction ring, and the other had wound infection with wound breakdown, both in patients with no dressings (P < 0.05). Follow-up was available for 58 patients, with a median of 22 months (3-79 months). Two required redosurgery (3.5%), one with poor cosmetic result and one recurrence. In all patients, a normal circumcised appearance had been achieved and in 47, cosmetic result was excellent (81%). Five patients have residual suprapubic fat, and four, excess ventral skin. One with residual suprapubic fat has reached puberty and it has resolved. All declared good stream. The same technique was used for six patients with poor cosmetic result after surgery elsewhere. The outcome is excellent for all, with median follow-up of 20.5 months (5-31 months).

Conclusion: The 'anatomical' repair provides the ability to create the appearance of a standard circumcision, which is generally accepted as normality. Apart from the penis itself, this technique facilitates correction of the penoscrotal transposition, giving the external genitalia the best appearance. It seems to provide good functional and cosmetic outcomes, and it holds true at mid- to long-term follow-up. Dressings and catheter can potentially prevent postoperative complications. However, a prospective study with standardised parameters is required to confirm these findings.

Keywords: Mega-prepuce; Megaprepuce; Penis.