This study assessed application techniques for cementation of fiber-reinforced posts (FRPs). The treatment groups were defined by FRP luting application techniques and included 5 groups of 10 simulated teeth each: 1, application of the cement on the post using a syringe; 2, application of the cement in the canal using a syringe; 3, application of the cement in the canal and on the post using a syringe; 4, application of the cement in the canal using a syringe/Lentulo spiral instrument; and 5, application of the cement in the canal using a syringe/Lentulo spiral and on the post using a syringe. A dual-curing, automixing cement was utilized as the luting agent. For each group, the canals were endodontically prepared using tapered hand and rotary files and obturated, and then the FRPs were cemented in place. All specimens were encased in acrylic and sectioned at 2 locations, creating 4 viewing surfaces: coronal (C), middle coronal (MC), middle apical (MA), and apical (A). The surfaces were examined using a stereomicroscope and digitized computer software. The efficacy of each FRP application technique was determined in terms of percentages of cement void area by group and by surface. Group 1 exhibited a significantly (P < 0.05) greater overall percentage of cement void area than all other groups. Group 2 exhibited the smallest overall percentage of void area, although the difference was not always statistically significant. There were no statistically significant differences among the surfaces in cement void area (P > 0.05) when the areas of the different groups were combined. The most efficacious cementation method was the injection of cement into the canal space with a syringe, while the use of a Lentulo spiral instrument was found to be an unnecessary step.
Keywords: endodontics; fiber-reinforced posts; luting cement application techniques.