Background: Little is known on the use of artesunate compared with quinine for the treatment of imported malaria cases in nonendemic countries with a high level of care. Therefore, we compared the 2 treatments in terms of mortality and hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) discharge rates.
Methods: We analyzed the cohort of all severe imported malaria patients reported to the French National Reference Center from 2011 to 2017. After controlling for differences between quinine- and artesunate-treated individuals using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method, 28-day mortality rate was compared between the groups as well as hospital and ICU discharge rates using Kaplan-Meier estimation and weighted Cox proportional hazard models.
Results: Overall, 1544 patients were enrolled. Fifty patients died, 18 in the quinine group (n = 460) and 32 in the artesunate group (n = 1084), corresponding to death rates of 3.9% and 2.9%, respectively. No difference was evident between quinine and artesunate either in mortality or in hospital discharge rate, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-2.25) and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.94-1.34), respectively. Artesunate was associated with a faster ICU discharge rate (HR, 1.18. 95% CI, 1.02-1.36).
Conclusions: In a country with a high level of care, artesunate was associated with a shorter length of stay in the ICU, which supports the actual therapeutic transition; however, no difference was found in terms of mortality or in hospital discharge rates between artesunate- and quinine-treated patients.
Keywords: artesunate; imported severe malaria; quinine.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.