A comprehensive evaluation of the long-term economic impact of major bile duct injury

HPB (Oxford). 2019 Oct;21(10):1312-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Mar 9.

Abstract

Background: Complications and litigation after bile duct injury (BDI) result in clinical and economic burden. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the long-term clinical and economic impact of major BDI.

Method: Patients with long-term follow-up after Strasberg E BDI were identified. Costs of treatment and litigation were the primary outcome. Relationships between these outcomes and repair factors, like timing of repair and surgeon expertise, were secondary outcomes.

Results: Among 139 patients with a median follow up of 10.7 years, 40% of patients developed biliary complications. Repairs by non-specialist surgeons had significantly higher follow up and treatment costs than those by specialists (£25,814 vs. £14,269, p < 0.001). Estimated litigation costs were higher in delayed than immediate repairs (£23,295 vs. £12,864). As such, the lowest average costs per BDI are after immediate specialist repair and the highest after delayed non-specialist repair (£27,133 vs. £49,109, ×1.81 more costly, p < 0.001). Repair by a non-specialist surgeon (HR: 4.00, p < 0.001) and vascular injury (HR: 2.35, p = 0.013) were significant independent predictors of increased complication rates.

Conclusion: Costs of major BDI are considerable. They can be reduced by immediate on-table repair by specialist surgeons. This must therefore be considered the standard of care wherever possible.

MeSH terms

  • Bile Duct Diseases / economics*
  • Bile Duct Diseases / etiology
  • Bile Duct Diseases / surgery
  • Bile Ducts / injuries*
  • Bile Ducts / surgery
  • Cholecystectomy / adverse effects*
  • Cost of Illness*
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Forecasting*
  • Humans
  • Iatrogenic Disease / economics*
  • Jejunostomy / economics*
  • Jejunostomy / methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies