The effect of bone vibrator coupling method on the neonate auditory brainstem response

Int J Audiol. 2019 Jun;58(6):339-344. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1578426. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of three bone vibrator coupling methods on the neonate auditory brainstem response (ABR).

Design: A repeated measures design was employed. Three coupling techniques were utilised (i.e. hand-held, hand-held applied force gauge and elastic band). ABRs were evoked with a bone-conducted 30 dB nHL 4000 Hz CE-Chirp octave band stimulus. A temporal bone area supero-posterior auricular position for bone vibrator placement was utilised.

Study sample: Twenty-six healthy full-term neonates participated.

Results: Replicated ABRs were recorded from all neonates for each coupling method. There was a statistically significant effect of coupling on wave V latency (p < 0.001) and amplitude (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between the elastic band and the hand-held force gauge coupling for wave V latency and amplitude (p > 0.05). However, the hand-held coupling method produced significantly longer wave V latency and smaller amplitude versus the elastic band and hand-held force gauge (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Bone vibrator coupling method affects the neonate ABR. Clinicians should be consistent with the choice of coupling while delivering controlled bone-conducted stimuli in ABR assessments in neonates and infants.

Keywords: Electrophysiology; auditory brainstem response; bone conduction; chirp; instrumentation; pediatric.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem*
  • Female
  • Hearing Tests / methods*
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn*
  • Male
  • Neonatal Screening / methods