NMD-12: A new machine-learning derived screening instrument to detect mild cognitive impairment and dementia

PLoS One. 2019 Mar 8;14(3):e0213430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213430. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Introduction: Using machine learning techniques, we developed a brief questionnaire to aid neurologists and neuropsychologists in the screening of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.

Methods: With the reduction of the survey size as a goal of this research, feature selection based on information gain was performed to rank the contribution of the 45 items corresponding to patient responses to the specified questions. The most important items were used to build the optimal screening model based on the accuracy, practicality, and interpretability. The diagnostic accuracy for discriminating normal cognition (NC), MCI, very mild dementia (VMD) and dementia was validated in the test group.

Results: The screening model (NMD-12) was constructed with the 12 items that were ranked the highest in feature selection. The receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) in the test group was 0.94 for discriminating NC vs. MCI, 0.88 for MCI vs. VMD, 0.97 for MCI vs. dementia, and 0.96 for VMD vs. dementia, respectively.

Discussion: The NMD-12 model has been developed and validated in this study. It provides healthcare professionals with a simple and practical screening tool which accurately differentiates NC, MCI, VMD, and dementia.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Area Under Curve
  • Cognitive Dysfunction / diagnosis*
  • Dementia / diagnosis*
  • Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted / statistics & numerical data
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Female
  • Geriatric Assessment / methods
  • Geriatric Assessment / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Machine Learning*
  • Male
  • Mass Screening / methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Neuropsychological Tests / statistics & numerical data
  • ROC Curve
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.