Seroprevalence of Q fever among metropolitan and non-metropolitan blood donors in New South Wales and Queensland, 2014-2015

Med J Aust. 2019 Apr;210(7):309-315. doi: 10.5694/mja2.13004. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of exposure to the causative agent of Q fever (Coxiella burnetii) and of current infections among blood donors in Australia.

Design, setting: Cross-sectional study in metropolitan Sydney and Brisbane, and in non-metropolitan regions with high Q fever notification rates (Hunter New England in New South Wales; Toowoomba in Queensland).

Participants: Blood donors attending Red Cross collection centres during October 2014 - June 2015 who provided sera and completed a questionnaire on Q fever vaccination status, diagnosis and knowledge, and exposure history.

Main outcome measures: Age- and sex-standardised seroprevalence of phase II IgG antibodies to C. burnetii (indicating past exposure) and independent risk factors for seropositivity; presence of C. burnetii DNA (indicating current infection and risk of transmission by blood transfusion).

Results: 2740 donors (94.5% response rate) completed the questionnaire and supplied sera for analysis. Crude antibody seroprevalence was 3.6%. Standardised seroprevalence was higher in non-metropolitan than metropolitan regions (NSW, 3.7% v 2.8%; Queensland, 4.9% v 1.6%; statistically significant only in Queensland). Independent predictors of antibody seropositivity were regular contact with sheep, cattle, or goats (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.3; 95% CI, 2.1-14), abattoir work (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.9), and assisting at an animal birth (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.6). Having lived in a rural area but having only rare or no contact with sheep, cattle or goats was itself a significant risk factor (v never lived rurally: aOR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1-5.9). 40% of people in groups recommended for vaccination were aware of the vaccine; 10% of people in these groups had been vaccinated. C. burnetii DNA was not detected in 1681 non-metropolitan samples, suggesting that transmission by blood donation is unlikely.

Conclusions: Given their exposure to multiple risk factors, vaccination against Q fever should be considered for all rural residents.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Q fever; Risk factors.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Animals
  • Antibodies, Bacterial / blood*
  • Blood Donors / statistics & numerical data*
  • Cattle
  • Coxiella burnetii
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Goats
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulin G / blood
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • New South Wales / epidemiology
  • Prevalence
  • Q Fever / epidemiology*
  • Q Fever / prevention & control*
  • Queensland / epidemiology
  • Risk Factors
  • Rural Population
  • Seroepidemiologic Studies
  • Sheep
  • Vaccination / statistics & numerical data*
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Antibodies, Bacterial
  • Immunoglobulin G