Breast MRI and X-ray mammography registration using gradient values

Abstract

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray mammography are two image modalities widely used for early detection and diagnosis of breast diseases in women. The combination of these modalities, traditionally done using intensity-based registration algorithms, leads to a more accurate diagnosis and treatment, due to the capability of co-localizing lesions and susceptibles areas between the two image modalities. In this work, we present the first attempt to register breast MRI and X-ray mammographic images using intensity gradients as the similarity measure. Specifically, a patient-specific biomechanical model of the breast, extracted from the MRI image, is used to mimic the mammographic acquisition. The intensity gradients of the glandular tissue are directly projected from the 3D MRI volume to the 2D mammographic space, and two different gradient-based metrics are tested to lead the registration, the normalized cross-correlation of the scalar gradient values and the gradient correlation of the vectoral gradients. We compare these two approaches to an intensity-based algorithm, where the MRI volume is transformed to a synthetic computed tomography (pseudo-CT) image using the partial volume effect obtained by the glandular tissue segmentation performed by means of an Expectation-Maximization algorithm. This allows us to obtain the digitally reconstructed radiographies by a direct intensity projection. The best results are obtained using the scalar gradient approach along with a transversal isotropic material model, obtaining a target registration error (TRE), in millimeters, of 5.65 ± 2.76 for CC- and of 7.83 ± 3.04 for MLO-mammograms, while the TRE is 7.33 ± 3.62 in the 3D MRI. We also evaluate the effect of the glandularity of the breast as well as the landmark position on the TRE, obtaining moderated correlation values (0.65 and 0.77 respectively), concluding that these aspects need to be considered to increase the accuracy in further approaches.

Keywords: Breast cancer; MRI; Multimodal registration; X-ray mammography.